Unguarded danger at East Yorkshire firm19 November 2014

A chemical company in East Yorkshire has been fined a total of £28,000 and ordered to pay £1,813 in costs after an employee lost the ends of three fingers in an unguarded part of a machine collecting calcium oxide dust.

The 51-year-old worker was attempting to adjust a bag that was capturing the chemical dust below a collection unit at Omya UK when his left hand slipped and came into contact with a shear point created by a rotating valve.

The moving part severed the tips of his first, second and third fingers to the first joint. He has since recovered and been able to return to work.

The incident, on 14 Feb 2013 at the firm's site in Melton, was investigated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which prosecuted the firm for safety failings at Beverley Magistrates' Court.

The court was told that ductwork under the rotary valve had been dismantled so the fine oxide could be collected in bags underneath, which was an unusual method. The necks of the bags were placed under the valve but did not fit properly.

When the worker noticed a build-up of powder on the outside of a bag, he had tried to adjust the fit and his hand caught the valve.

HSE's investigation identified that Omya UK had totally failed to assess the risks involved with running the machine without the ductwork in place and so had also failed to make sure the dangerous parts were properly guarded.

Omya UK, Humber Plant, Melton, North Ferriby, East Yorkshire, admitted breaching the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations, and a breach of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations.
HSE inspector Steve Kay said: "This case underlines the need for managers to consider risks before they get employees to carry out unusual or non-routine work. If that had happened, Omya could have prevented one of their employees being maimed for life. This is the essence of risk assessment – it is not pointless form-filling bureaucracy.

"Had Omya UK Ltd given some thought to this task, it would have been obvious that a guard was needed to stop accidental contact with a nasty shear trap inside the machine.

"Their poor planning meant workers getting near a dangerous part in order to try to make a bad plan work."

Ian Vallely

Related Companies
Health & Safety Executive

This material is protected by MA Business copyright
See Terms and Conditions.
One-off usage is permitted but bulk copying is not.
For multiple copies contact the sales team.